Sunday, July 7, 2013

INAUGURAL SPEECH OF BM IVY DALUMPINES


I stand before youtoday gratefulfor the trust, confidence and the mandate you have bestowed upon me; yet humbled by the tasks and challenges that lie ahead.

Our beloved governor Lala Taliño – Mendoza; Vice Governor Gregorio Ipong; my soon-to-be colleagues in the Sangguniang Panlalawigan; Provincial Heads of Offices; our diligent public servants who are stationed at the various offices here in Amas; City, Municipal and Barangay Officials who are with us today; distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen: A pleasant morning to all of you.

All of us have heard of the term family values. Some of us may have taken the term lightly while some of us may have pondered on what it really means. For me, “family values” simply means that we are a family and that each one of us, being a family member, is valuable. Our province of Cotabato is a large family where you and I belong – with our esteemed Governor Lala Talino-Mendoza as our mother and head, with the rest of our elected provincial officials acting as our older brothers and sisters responsible for looking after the best interest of their younger siblings. By electing this humble representation during the recently-concluded election, you have officially made me one of your older sisters in the family. From the bottom of my heart, I cannot thank you enough for giving me the privilege to serve you.

As leaders in our family, we are aware that many of our family members are still suffering from the afflictions of ill-education, poor health conditions, hopelessness, poverty and intergenerational economic neglect. In as much as there is not a single solution to the problems besetting our family, these challenges confronting us are undoubtedly huge that our Governor cannot carry all the burdens singlehandedly by herself. She needs each and everyone’s help; thus, this is the time for team work, cooperation, and partnership among us, leaders in the family.

Being a neophyte in this august chamber and an elder sister in the Provincial Government family, I am very excited to work with my soon-to-be colleagues in crafting appropriate policies and laws for the general welfare of our people. And as an obedient and respectful daughter to her mother, I will likewise be supportive to our Governor and to her programs and projects that are geared to uplift poverty, restore the peace, address human insecurities, and bring hope to the hopeless. There is a time for everything and a season for every activity; thus says Ecclesiastes Chapter 3 verse 1. And I say: this is a time to forget about politics and let us instead start healing the wounds of the recent elections. Now is the time to act as one united family with God at the center. Together, we can break free from the shackles of poverty and ill-education as we labor to fan the flickering sense of hope among our fellow Cotabateños.

In our quest to find remedies to the social and economic evils that hound the province, I ask you our beloved constituents to continue supporting us, the leaders you have chosen, as we work hard to remain worthy of the trust that you have bestowed upon us.

Let us all work hard together to remove Cotabato on the list of the top 20 poorest province in the Philippines. Let us dream together. Let us believe together. Let us hope together. And together, let us scatter these seeds of hope as we inch our way toward the fulfillment of the vision that is Cotabato.

You are a part of the family just as I am a part of it too. We are one and as one shall we bear the labor pains of a more dynamic, more equitable, more progressive, more empowered and more growth-inclusive Cotabato Province.

You, I, everybody has an important role to play. We are a family and as a family we shall act. After all, we value not only one another but even the future of our children and the generations to come.

Thank you very much and may God bless us all.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Ang Pusang Namuhay ng Isang Milyong Beses*

1
May isang pusa na namuhay ng isang milyong taon. Isang milyong beses na siyang namatay pero isang milyong beses din siya nabuhay muli. Siya ay isang napakagandang pusa na animo isang tigre sa hitsura. Isang milyong tao na rin ang nagmahal at nag-aruga sa kanya at ganun din ang bilang ng mga taong umiyak sa tuwing siya ay namamatay. Subalit ang pusa ay hindi naiyak para sa mga taong umaruga sa kanya. Ni minsan hindi siya naiyak.


2
Minsan nang naging alaga ng isang hari ang pusa. Mahal na mahal siya ng hari subalit ayaw naman ng pusa sa kanya. Magaling kasi ang hari sa pakikidigma kaya laging nasa mga digmaan ang hari. Sa tuwing nagpupunta sa giyera ang hari, bitbit niya ang pusa na nilalagay niya sa isang magandang kahon. Sa isang digmaan, natamaan ng palaso ang pusa na siyang ikinamatay nito. Sa gitna ng mga naglilipanang sibat at palaso at kalansing ng mga kampilan at tagak, naiyak ang hari nang makita niya ang patay niyang pusa. Itinigil ng hari ang pakikipagdigma at umuwi sa kanyang kastilyo na may pagdadalamhati. Lubos din ang dalamhati ng hari habang inililibing niya ang pusa niya sa hardin ng kanyang kastilyo.

3
Minsan din naging alaga ng isang mandaragat ang pusa. Ayaw na ayaw ng pusa sa karagatan. Pero laging dala ng mandaragat ang pusa sa lahat ng kanyang mga ekspedisyon. Dala niya ito noong nilayag niya ang Pitong Karagatan. Dala rin niya ang pusa sa mga dinadaungan niyang mga pantalan sa iba’t ibang bahagi ng mundo. Isang araw, nahulog ang pusa sa dagat. Sinikap isalba ng mandaragat ang pusa gamit ang lambat pero namatay pa rin ito dahil hindi marunong lumangoy and pusa. Umiyak ang mandaragat habang kalong niya ang basang katawan ng alaga niya. Nagdalamhati rin siya nang inilibing niya ang pusa sa ilalim ng isang mayabong na punong-kahoy sa parke ng isang malayong pantalan.

4
Minsan ay naging alaga rin ng isang sikat na salamangkero sa circus ang pusa. Ayaw ng pusa sa mga circus. Isinasalang kasi ng salamangkero ang pusa sa tuwing ito ay nagpapakita ng kanyang mga mahika sa mga batang manonood. Inilalagay niya ang pusa sa isang kahon at kunyari hahatiin niya ang pusa at kahon gamit ang lagari. Pagkatapos ang kunyari paghati nito sa pusa at kahon, hihilain ng salamangkero ang pusa na buo pa rin ang katawan nito. Mamamangha ang mga manonood at papalakpakan nila ang pagtatanghal. Subalit sa isang pagtatanghal, aksidenteng nahati nga nang totoo ng salamangkero ang pusa. Namatay ito ora mismo. Walang masigabong palakpakan mula sa mga manonood. Ang namayani ay ang pag-iyak ng salamangkero habang hawak niya ang nahating katawan ng alaga niyang pusa. Nagdalamhati rin siya ng husto habang inililibing niya ang pusa sa likod ng circus tent.

5
Minsan ay naging alaga ng isang magnanakaw ang pusa. Ayaw na ayaw ng pusa sa mga magnanakaw. Inaakay kasi ng magnanakaw ang pusa sa tuwing ito ay napakatahimik na bumabagtas sa mga madidilim na lansangan. Ginagamit din ng magnanakaw na panlansi ang pusa sa mga aso na nagbabantay sa mga bahay na gustong nakawan ng kawatan. Habang kinakahulan at hinahabol ng mga aso ang pusa ay nilolooban naman ng magnanakaw ang bahay na binabantayan ng mga aso. Makailang beses na nagtagumpay ang magnanakaw. Subalit sa isang lakad ng magnanakaw at ng pusa ay nahuli ng mga aso ang pusa. Kinagat nila nang kinagat ang pusa hanggang sa ito ay mamatay. Walang nagawa ang magnanakaw kundi ang umiyak habang kalong nito ang durog na bangkay ng pusa kasama ang nanakaw niyang diyamante. Umiiyak pa rin siya habang binabagtas niya ang madilim na daan pauwi sa bahay niya. Nagdalamhati rin ng sobra ang magnanakaw habang inililibing niya ang namatay niyang alaga sa kanyang maliit na hardin.

6
Minsan ay naging alaga ng isang matandang babae ang pusa. Walang amor ang pusa sa mga matatandang babae. Araw-araw na kandong ng matandang babae ang pusa habang pinapanood niya mula sa maliit niyang bintana ang mga kaganapan sa kapaligiran. Sa bawat araw na kandong ng matandang babae ang pusa ay walang magawa ang pusa kundi ang matulog na lang. Sa paglipas ng panahon, tumanda at nanghina ang pusa hanggang sa ito ay mamatay. Naghinagpis ang matandang babae habang sinusubukan niyang gisingin ang lungayngay at matanda nang katawan ng namayapang pusa. Lalo pa siyang naghinagpis habang ibinabaon niya sa ilalim ng puno sa kanyang likodbahay ang pusang nakasama niya sa mahabang panahon.

7
Minsan ding naging alaga ng isang batang babae ang pusa. Ayaw na ayaw ng pusa sa mga bata. Hinehele ng batang babae ang pusa na parang sanggol. Mahigpit ding yakap-yakap ng bata ang alaga niyang pusa sa tuwing siya ay natutulog. Kapag umiiyak ang batang babae ay ginagawa rin niyang pamunasan ng luha ang likod ng pusa. Minsan, aksidenteng nasakal ang pusa sa mahigpit na pagkakatali ng kumot sa likuran ng batang babae. Umiyak nang umiyak ang bata habang bitbit niya ang lungayngay na katawan ng pusa. Umiiyak din siya habang inililibing niya ang pusa sa likuran ng bahay nila. Ngunit walang pakialam ang pusa kahit pa ito ay maghihingalo at unti-unting mamamatay.

8
Minsan ay namuhay din ang pusa na walang nag-aalaga sa kanya. Siya ay isang pusang-gala. Ito ang unang pagkakataon na pagmamay-ari ng pusa ang sarili niyang buhay at katawan. Sobra ang pagmamahal ng pusa sa kanyang sarili. At dahil siya ay isang magandang pusa na animo tigre sa hitsura, gustung-gusto siya ng maraming mga pusa. Maraming mga babaeng pusa ang nagpapapansin sa kanya sa pag-asang maging asawa nila ang pusang animo tigre sa hitsura. May ibang mga babaeng pusa na nagdadala sa kanya ng malalaking isda para kainin niya. May iba rin na nagreregalo sa kanya ng mga pinakamagandang daga na nahuhuli nila. Samantalang may iba namang mga pusang babae na nagboboluntaryong sila na lang ang mandila sa magandang balahibo ng ating bidang pusa para hindi na siya mapagod sa paglilinis ng katawan niya. Ang mga ito at marami pa ay ginawa ng maraming mga babaeng pusa para lang mabigyan niya ng kahit konting pagtingin ang mga ito. Gustong-gusto naman ng pusa ang atensiyon na nakukuha niya. Ipinagmamayabang pa niya na siya ay namatay nang isang milyong beses at ngayon ay kaya na niyang tawanan ang kamatayan. Mahal na mahal ng pusa ang sarili niya nang higit sa lahat.

9
Subalit may isang pusa na hindi tumingin o nagpapansin sa kanya. Ang pusang ito ay isang magandang pusang babae na purong puti ang balahibo. Minsan ay nagpunta ang pusang animo tigre sa puting pusa at ipinagmayabang niya dito na isang milyong beses na siyang namatay. Walang interes na sinagot lang siya ng puting pusa ng “Ganoon ba? Eh ano ngayon?” Sobra ang pagmamahal ng pusa sa sarili niya kaya nakaramdam siya ng konting galit at pagkainsulto sa kawalang interes ng puting pusa sa kanya. Araw-araw niyang binabalikan ang puting pusa at sinasabihan ng kung anu-ano tulad ng “Ito lang naman ang buhay na naranasan mo, di ba? Hindi ka pa nakaranas kahit man lang isang kamatayan.” Tahimik lang naman siyang sinasagot ng puting pusa ng litanyang gaya ng “Siguro.” Sa isang pagbisita niya, tatlong beses tumambling ang mala-tigreng pusa sa harapan ng puting pusa sabay sabi “Minsan na akong namuhay na kasama sa mga tanghalan sa circus at karnabal.” Tahimik pa rin ang putting pusa na sumagot ng “Ganoon ba?” Nakaramdam ng pagkayamot ang pusang animo tigre ang hitsura at sinimulan na naman niyang magyabang sa pagsasabing isang milyong beses na siyang namamatay. Ngunit sa huli, itinigil ng pusa ang pagyayabang niya at tahimik na lang na tinanong niya ang puting pusa kung gusto nito na maging asawa niya. “Oo” ang sagot ng puting pusa kaya simula noong araw na iyon ay naging mag-asawa na sila.

10
Nanganak ng maraming magagandang pusa ang puting pusa. Samantala, ang pusang animo tigre sa hitsura ay tumigil na sa pagyayabang na maka-isang milyong beses na siyang namatay pero namuhay muli. Ngayon kasi ay mas mahal ng pusa ang asawa niya at ang kanilang mga anak kesa sa sarili niya. Sa paglipas ng panahon, lumaki at nagsariling-buhay na rin ang mga anak ng pusa. May katuwaan at pagmamalaki na sinabi ng mala-tigreng pusa sa asawa niya na “Lumaking mga magagandang pusang-gala ang mga anak natin, di ba?” Natutuwa ring sinagot siya ng asawa niya ng “Oo.” Sa kasiyahang nararamdaman ng puting pusa ay nadidinig ang paghaging ng kanyang hininga. At kalakip ng paglipas ng panahon ay ang unti-unting panghihina ng tumatandang katawan ng puting pusa.

11
Magkatabi silang lagi at naririnig din lagi ng mala-tigreng pusa ang kuntentong paghaging ng hininga ng kanyang asawa. Mapa-araw at mapa-gabi ay magkasama sila sa pagnamnam ng kasiyahang dulot ng kuntento nilang buhay. Mapa-araw at mapa-gabi ay dinig ang humahaging na paghininga ng puting pusa na katabi lamang ng pusang noong araw ay sobra ang pagmamahal sa sarili. Hanggang sa isang araw ay wala nang marinig na haging ng paghinga ng puting pusa. Niyugyog siya ng pusang animo tigre sa hitsura subalit wala nang buhay ang matanda nang katawan ng puting pusa. Sa unang pagkakataon ay umiyak ang pusang namatay pero nabuhay din ng isang milyong beses. Mapa-araw at mapa-gabi ay umiiyak siya sa tabi ng namayapa niyang asawa. Mapa-araw at mapa-gabi ay lumuluha siya habang sinasariwa niya ang mga alaala ng buhay nilang dalawa ng puting pusa. Mapa-araw at mapa-gabi ay wala siyang naramdaman kundi ang labis na pagluluksa para sa namatay niyang asawa. Hanggang sa nawalan na rin siya ng hininga at pahandusay na bumagsak sa walang buhay na katawan ng puting pusa. Namatay sa araw na iyon ang pusang animo tigre ang hitsura. Namatay siya at hindi na nabuhay muli.


_______________________________
* This Japanese fable penned by Yoko Sano is translated to English by my good friend Rieko Semba and to Filipino by yours truly. Ms Semba was first introduced to the Philippine society in 2006 when she took part in a three-week Japanese students’ immersion stint in Ifugao. Since then, she’d been coming yearly to the Philippines until she eventually decided in February 2008 to discontinue for a year her undergraduate studies at Rikkyo University (Tokyo) so to be a full-time volunteer in two shelters for street children in Quezon City and in a nationwide peasants’ organization based in Calauan, Laguna. Ang Pusang Namuhay ng Isang Milyong Beses is the latest story she has read during her week-long sojourn to the country last May 2012 to the wards of Silong Tanglaw (a shelter for boys located at Araneta Avenue, Quezon City) and to the children of some peasants in Cavite and Laguna.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

BEYOND THE PARCHMENT CURTAIN

“The greatest difficulties for governments arise where resources
are limited and needs and aspirations are sharply rising.”

- Agency for International Development


Given the University of the Philippines System’s thrust of being the foremost provider of tertiary and advanced education in the country, the government has consistently funded the University relatively much higher as compared to other state universities and colleges (SUCs) in the country. As a matter of fact, almost 1/3 of the annual budget allocation for higher education goes to the UP System, hence, the analogy of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” (Fernandez, Philippine Star) in reference to the fact that the UP System gets the lion’s share of the Philippines' Commission on Higher Education (CHED) budget.

Briones quoted Kohler’s definition of budget as a financial plan which serves as the pattern for and control over future operations, and as a systematic plan for the utilization of manpower, material or other resources.

Using the above-mentioned definition to assess the UP budget, this student cannot help but notice one prominent feature of the UP budget from 2003-2009: the consistent increases in allotments for infrastructure and other capital outlay related items, and so with personnel services.

As a trend, the budget allocation for UP increases annually, except for the fiscal years 2005 and 2006 (2005 reenacted budget) wherein the said annual budget was lower by 4% or P177,302,000 as compared to the budget allotments for 2003 and 2004 (2003 reenacted budget). Of significance is the leap in general allotment from 2003 (P4,340,096,000) to 2009 (P7,058,087,000), which marked a 62.63% increase from the former budget or an addition of P2,717,991,000 in just a 4-year gap period.

Definitely the difference in budget allocation could be attributed to many factors. Among others, inflation adjustment may be a key point of reference (as reflected by the consistent huge increases in MOOE within the period under scrutiny), so with the increase in maintenance and operating expenses as a result of past acquisition/establishment of additional capital investments.

But more to inflation adjustments for MOOE, the increase in the salary of UP personnel as an effect of the government policy of increasing government employees’ salary via the Salary Standardization Laws (SSL) was also reflected by the P596,358,000 Personnel Services (PS) budget gap between that of 2009 and 2003, or an increase of 17.28% using the 2003 allocation for PS as a base. Assuming that UP did not hire a significant number of additional personnel before 2009, the effect of SSL could be better quantified by comparing the PS allocation for 2008 (P3,696,421,000) with that of 2009 (P4,048,017,000), wherein we could easily notice a significant increase of 9.52% equivalent to P351,596,000, which is but an adjustment in deference to the SSL3 implemented last July 2009.

"The University of the Philippines System takes pride in being the pioneer in higher education through academic excellence, outstanding research, public service, and modernized facilities... By streamlining functions, encouraging innovation and creativity in its course offerings, as well as developing its technological and physical infrastructure, UP hopes to meet the demands of the changing times and take its place as one of the best in the region, and eventually, the world." (UP Website)

That public budgeting serves as the allocation of expenditures among different purposes to achieve the greatest results has been better understood by this student upon taking a peek on the annual UP budget allocations. Being the pilot university of the country’s tertiary education system and given the fierce international and local competition in terms of education standards, it is quite understandable why the UP administration (as supported by the government) wants to increase if not further improve its infrastructures, amenities, and other capitals both human and nonhuman. UP is apparently operating this “facelifts” because it projects itself as one of the near future’s best providers of tertiary education and graduate studies in this region. This vision is the backbone of UP’s quest for better amenities, state of the art equipments and efficient and highly qualified faculty and personnel, thus the rationale behind the general increase in PS and CO allotments from 2003-2009.

As noble yet ambitious as it may sound, the budgetary allocations of UP for infrastructure and equipment acquisition (capital outlay), especially those of 2008 and 2009, reflect UP’s plans and actions toward the [incremental] realization of the Vision. The government supports UP’s quest, but so does some foreign organizations through the foreign funds/assistance that the UP budget allocations from 2003-2009 project.

With all the huge amounts of money given to UP by both the national government and foreign donors, one cannot help but think that UP is indeed the favorite university of the government. But when one scrutinizes the budget, it would be a revelation to know that UP is not as super-blessed as the budget appears to project. For one, the UP budget includes the operation, support to operation and maintenance of the Philippine General Hospital, which comprises almost one third of the total UP System’s budget for programs. Furthermore, UP Diliman is not the sole campus of the UP System since the System covers seven constituent universities located in various parts of the country. Hence, the budget allocation for the UP System is not sufficient to cover all the expenditure necessary to attain or respond to the various mandates set upon to the University, not to mention the Vision that UP has imposed upon itself.

It would perhaps be of consolation to the UP administration if indeed the national government gives the budget allocation to the last centavo. However, and as was experienced by my College [in the University], there was an item included in UP’s budget under the 2007 GAA that was not delivered. This student is referring to the 2007 budget allocation of up to P5million (but Prof has told me that is actually P20million) for a building which is supposed to rise at the back of the 1896 cafeteria. With this single case, this student cannot help but speculate if ever there are similar items in the UP budget that were not delivered according to plans. And if so, this student can conclude that even UP is not spared from “straying from the Plan”.

Briones wrote that there is a recognition by the national leadership that the allocation of the limited resources of the government via the GAA is one that is based on need, not want. Given the effect of inflation, the cut-throat competition for fund allocation among the different government agencies, the adjustments needed to appease employees’ unions, and concessions to student demand for cheaper cost of UP education, the high price of modernization and competence-building, and many more tasks and financial constraints at hand, the University of the Philippines is faced with the challenge on how to stretch its coffers so as to meet the mandates and attain the University’s vision.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

EXHIBIT X: Typhoons Pedring and Quiel

I am in the middle of a raging storm. Overhead the wind is howling like a terribly grieving madman while on land the rain is beating mercilessly on any object that is exposed to the elements.


As I seek refuge on a narrow awning of a friend's totally drenched kitchen, I watch as boxes and household implements of all kinds and sizes get blown like dust on a gust. Many ipil, g. melina and mahogany trees that have stood proud and tall along the national highway a day before are now reduced into heaps of waste and highway obstruction. And even though I am getting wet, I have to stay on this very spot for my own safety; toward the east and south of my friend's kitchen, I can see GI sheets and various debris go airborne breaking glass windows and destroying the shrubbery and small structures built for pets and livestock...


So reads a part of an entry in my journal dated September 27, 2011. I was in Lamut, Ifugao.

It has been days ago since typhoons Pedring and Quiel pummeled my province and the greater areas of the Cordilleras, Ilocos Region, Cagayan Valley and Central Luzon. In less than a week's gap, these two typhoons ravaged this part of the country leaving 55 people dead, more than a hundred barangays submerged in water, billions of pesos worth of damages in the agriculture sector, 72 collapsed or damaged bridges, and massive electricity and communication services disruption.

Of course the list above does not yet include the aggregate cost of opportunities and value-added lost, the burden on additional health-care expenditure to the already max-strained government budget for health, the yet again diminished capacities of many poor families in the rural and highly populated towns, the strains set on local government units (LGUs) as they try to attend to the physiological and shelter needs of their respective constituents (read: relief goods and evacuation centers), the sky-rocketing prices of foods and commodities especially in the affected areas, and many more.


Typhoons Pedring and Quiel painted a rather grim picture not only on the local but even on the national arena. Residents of many provinces in the Northern Luzon area, whose damaged bridges disconnected them to the commercial or business centers, were on a panic buying mode for fuel and basic commodities never minding the additional cost as long as they would have a supply of their own (a liter of gasoline in the fringes of Ifugao and Mountain Province was at P85 from the original P57). On the other hand, residents of Metro Manila and other regions in Luzon buy their vegetables at an additional 150% – 300% of the prices prior to Pedring (a head of cabbage that I used to buy at P10 now bears a tag price of P30). Meanwhile, the big macroeconomic question is “What consequences will we expect of the country's rice and corn supply when the two typhoons eradicated the promise of a bountiful harvest?”

To have one member of your household die due to the typhoon is a very sad experience. But to be unable to bury your now decomposing dead because your community and the neighboring towns are submerged on hip-high water is a tragedy that is being borne year after year by some unfortunate residents of (pasintabi po) Calumpit, Bulacan and Apalit, Pampanga and some towns of Nueva Ecija, the Ilocos Region and Central Mindanao. There's the problem too that comes to the residents in those areas whenever they feel the number one and number two calls of nature. Not everybody has a toilet at the second or third level of his or her house. Hence, the sight of a floating yellow submarine seems to be as common as ejecting that thing out of the body. Of course there are shy people out there who try to somehow conceal the evidence by dumping their respective night soil on colored plastic bags. Yet these plastic bags are seen floating here, there and everywhere. Consequently, we now start to worry about water-borne diseases aside from the dreaded leptospirosis. But why worry much about the possibility of getting sick (that’s only a possibility!) when the people there are worrying more about obtaining enough drinking water, ready-to-eat foods, clean clothes and water for hygiene purposes?


On my way back to Manila last October 03, I watched as the bus I rode on sped along thousands of hectares of damaged rice and corn fields and rural communities. What used to be a wide expanse of green turned into shallow ponds of gray or light brown. I saw partially damaged houses made of concrete and GI sheets while nipa huts stood roofless and windowless. And as I witnessed more destruction along the way, my reverie delved on the plights of debt-ridden farmers struggling with adversities. And now, this. Ah, what a misery!

The calamity brought about by Pedring and Quiel is yet another call for the Filipino nation to seriously take to heart the threat of climate change. This particular picture is not an isolated case. It happened a few months back when strong rains and clogged water ways caused the sudden inundation of Cebu and Davao and Cotabato. It happened two years ago when typhoons Ondoy and Pepeng flooded Metro Manila, Laguna and Northern Luzon. It happened a couple of years ago when Harurot and Yoyong took away the lives of our loved ones including our houses, livestocks and near-harvests. It happened almost five or six years ago when the strong rains caused too much flash floods and landslides in Aurora and Quezon Provinces. It happened more than a decade ago in Ormoc City. In Antipolo. In Albay. In Camarines Sur. In many places.

The time for us to get ourselves educated and act on climate change is long past due. Acting on climate change is not the sole responsibility of the government. We as private individuals and citizens of this country must do our part, too, for the government alone is not responsible for this rather lack of preparedness and awareness among the general populace. The challenge for the government is not only to pass and really enforce laws on environmental protection; it also has to educate us about climate change and disaster risk reduction and control. On the other hand, we as individuals should also gather our acts and start to love and protect our environment. But this alone is not enough. We must start a revolution of the mind. We must start changing the distorted ways by which we view ourselves, our environment, our society and our government. The era of apathy and selfish convenience must end.

Now is the time for the Filipino nation to act in mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. Not only for the sake of our present lives or properties or environment but more so for that of the future generation's. This much we owe to them. This much, at least.

Now is the time to act. As one body. As one nation.


Mira-Nila Homes, Quezon City
October 08, 2011

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

THE POWER PARADOX

“We shall defeat the enemy by wielding tools of justice, social reform and equitable governance leading to better life.” (President Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino III)


In his Socratic dialogue Republic, Plato philosophized that the personal experiences of individual citizens can be analogous to what the State and its players as a whole go through. His parable of the four men in a cave somewhat says that some of us decide to simply believe and deem as real whatever that is being presented unto us. Some of us dare to question the credibility or state of reality of what we see or hear but rather stick to the status quo due to comfort or the fear of the unknown. Then there are some of us who, upon reflecting on things, reject the impositions of the immediate environment yet we still get lost in transition (or translation???) either due to comfort, misguided conformity or blatant surrender. On the other hand, there are some of us who, upon reflecting on things, reject the environmentally imposed illusions, struggle in the search of more truth and meaning and eventually get out of that cave of blind submission, ignorance and damnation, among others.

Upon watching the live coverage of President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III (PNoy), my mind could not help but recall that particular steam of Plato's philosophical mind. One part of my mind thought that Plato was sporting his intellectual arrogance as manifested by his rather negative description of three-fourths of the population in that parable of his. However, another part of me admired his genius for predicting a general reality among people two millenia ahead of his time.

To make Plato's point closer to the heart, we need not look far enough for the case of the Philippines is good enough an example. In one way or another, our history as a modern nation projects a picture of us embodying the Jung-ian persona of either of the four cavemen notwithstanding our own personal ideologies, values and narratives.

Let me elucidate.

The 30th of June 2010 is deemed as another milestone in the pages of Philippine modern history for it marked the swearing in of PNoy as the 15th president of the Republic. After almost a decade of having the uneasy feeling among the general public of the certainty that something wrong is going on but the public cannot pinpoint exactly which is it, it is therefore quite understandable as to why the Filipino nation stood vigilant in guarding the results of its exercise of its Constitutional freedom of suffrage during the past May 2010 elections. Corollary to that, it is of lesser wonder as to why a great percentage of the Filipino voters anticipated with expectation, if not excitement, the inaugural speech and the first and second SONA of PNoy.

1. In the eyes of skeptics and Filipinos who have resigned to the seemingly insurmountable social malady that has incessantly haunted the nation since time immemorial, the May 2010 elections and its aftermath are only but a tiny segment of a cyclic if not down-spiraling socio-econo-political pattern that this country is accursed with. The promises of change toward a better life and for no reconciliation without justice being served as uttered by PNoy are only but a rhetoric spoken yet again to appease the figurative thirst for blood (read: vengeance from past injustices and misdeeds) of the dominant majority.
2. On the other hand, there exists the fatalist minds of some of our pillars who think and profess that just as the initial euphoria of hope for a better Philippines is being felt now in PNoy's administration, it is actually nothing new for this feeling has swooped the country too during the early months of Cory Aquino's. So was it felt during the early years of Fidel Ramos'. And the early stage of Joseph Estrada's government. And even that of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's. In short, they are kind of saying that the Philippines is a doomed nation.
3. Now, we have some packs of people who dream for a better Philippines according to their own combinations of economic, political, cultural, religious and social standards or orientation. Their brilliant ideas and other steams of their minds can be summed up in two currencies: ideal and perfect. Ideal policies. Perfect states. However, there is this gaping hole in those two currencies they hold. First off, there can be NO ideal policy but only an optimum one*. Secondly, a perfect state or society is technically unattainable. The society is composed of many people with varying interests, concerns, needs and wants. The bottomline is, in the quest for ideal policies or perfect states, some of tend to go counterflow that we alienate or unite with others who are seeking for better national well-being albeit through a different avenue. Some of us see things only according to our own definition of what is black and what is white. And if in case we feel tired of our own struggle toward our desired state, heaven just knows what some of us do...or decide not to do.
4. Finally, there are some of us who, not being content with what we are seeing or hearing or experiencing, challenge or defy the status quo in our quest for better lives. Either for us as individuals and as collective citizens of one country. Or for our children and the next generation. We are aware of the obstacles, difficulties and the dangers that lie ahead but still we stick to our noble goal. If our own lives were at stake, so be it if it would mean a better chance for our children to lead a more meaningful life. A life of dignity.

In relation to this, where does each of us belong whenever we talk about national well-being? Which among the four categories do we belong to whenever we speak in terms of social awareness and responsibility, political consciousness and participation, participative governance, government policies, poverty alleviation and human and national development? Do we even care to think about it before we harshly criticize the government for perceived and felt market and government failures? Do we even know what we talk about whenever we speak words concerning the present state and possible future of our Nation?

Remembering the words of Dr. Jocelyn Cuaresma of UP-NCPAG, she said that there are many forms of government policy statements but the most overt of all is the President's SONA. I respect whatever point of view I hear or read pertaining to the current administration and its policies. But as a student of public administration, I think it is only but fair for us to do some litmus tests before we utter words of support/praise or criticism.

I am not new to listening to SONA hence my initial prediction that the PNoy's second SONA would yet again be filled with more self-righteous politicking, self-aggrandizement, half-sincere promises and other be-it-as-may campaign. However, as I watched the live coverage and read the transcript of PNoy's second SONA, I was unexpectedly overwhelmed by the kick and boost in my morale as a citizen of the Philippines. He seemed to be talking directly to me and that he sounded sincere enough with whatever report and policy statements he was uttering. The general message of his speech is very clear: a) that he means business when he has chosen to make “change” as his political slogan and platform; b) that the period of greed, mediocrity and complacency is over; c) that his administration is working to deliver whatever promises he has made so with his dream for a better Philippines; and d) that there can be no real change if not all sectors of the whole Philippine society genuinely strive for and participate in this PNoy administration-led revolution of the mind and values and practices. Not only did I feel like trusting my government once again; I also felt like bursting into tears as I endured the tug in my conscience for somewhat loosing hope for a better Philippines.

Peeking through PNoy's second SONA vis-a-vis his inauguration speech revolving on “change toward the better”, I say that his drive against rampant corruption in the government [and even in the private sector] is laudable enough. In other words, he walked his talk and people were inspired to talk because of his walk. For indeed, any government cannot perform satisfactorily in the eyes of observers and stakeholders (hence the many forms of intermingling financial, economic, political, social, security and/or psycho-emotional backlashes) if that government is tainted with doubt and scandals and controversies. The tenacity of the government (as being reported to the public by the media) in uncovering past mistakes and eventually suing allegedly erring people may qualify his administration's vow for a clean government as sincere enough. However, the efforts that he and his administration put on reviewing contracts both approved and still-to-be-approved and the implementation of the zero-based budgeting scheme in all government offices lend enough credence to the seriousness of PNoy's drive to steer the government and the country toward his perceived matuwid na landas in hopefully getting out of this very dark and slimy cave that we have found our country in. As a result thereof, PNoy, being the one occupying the highest seat of the Philippine government, has effectively waged a war against corruption in the government. I believe that he is a force to be reckoned with because he has successfully gained for himself a moral ascendancy and authority over his people. And that is no common feat among leaders...for gaining moral ascendancy and authority over one's subordinates is quite a rare occurrence in today's modern political arena. People look up to their leaders and follow after their leads almost all the time.

There are so many numbers that PNoy has mentioned in his SONA 2011. All of the statistics, the promises for more progress and the accompanying stern warnings that he mentioned only remind me of Nichollo Machiavelli's teaching that “If you cannot be loved and feared at the same time by your constituents, then better be feared than to be loved but not feared...” I somehow see a grain of truth and wisdom in these words of Machiavelli. What are positive statistics and realistic promises, indeed, if there were no threat of punishment for people who will try to tee us off to the marshlands after those tremendous efforts of the present administration to get us back to the fairway? Yes, my inner-self felt reinvigorated and proud by my President's political will and performance in his first year in office. Yes, I am clinging to this glimmer of hope for a positive revolution of the mindsets and systems not only amongst people in the bureaucracy but also among those in other sectors of our society. Yes, I believe that the masses now have a better confidence on the governmental systems, organizations and policies. That after all and despite PNoy's silence on his economic agenda for the country, there will be a genuine jump-starting not only of the Philippine politics or economics but even on our identity as a Filipino nation regardless of our religious and cultural divergences. It is not only me who is hoping for these; a 71% of legal-aged Filipinos share my hopes and trust in the government too.

In pondering over the string of various post-EDSA administrations that ran our country, Max Weber's classic work on bureaucracy teased my mind. Weber enumerated, described, praised and criticized the three sources of power of our leaders (to wit: charisma, traditional and rational-bureaucratic). He predicted too that the people would eventually tire of their leaders hence the changes of leaders from one with charisma to another privileged with very good pedigree, then to one blessed with rationality. And the circle repeats itself. Just as what the parchment curtains of our nation's post-EDSA narrative seem to portray.

Obviously, we have for a national leader somebody with a legendary pedigree. Only after his ascension to office that the Filipino nation noticed his rationality with his stubborn sense of right and wrong. And his style of running the government based on what he perceives as right or wrong makes sense. Only after he delivered his second SONA that I found him very charismatic enough I started doing away with pirated CDs and DVDs. And I felt good and more empowered. Because he empowered the people into standing for what is right. Because he has courageously pointed out to the Filipino nation another form of cancer that is seeping into the very fabric of our nationhood – that cancer of being selfish and deeply individualistic and crab-like.

Randy David, in a 2001 Philippine Daily Inquirer article pertaining to then President Joseph Estrada, has mentioned Pareto's theory that the icons or very strong preferences of people actually represent the silent personal aspirations of the same people about themselves. Following Pareto's line of thinking and given the overwhelming support (81% of total votes) that PNoy has received during the 2010 presidential election, then perhaps it is safe to conclude that a great majority of the Filipino nation has not given up on and for our country. Despite the odds, the Filipino nation has not totally sunk into the swamp of apathy and lawlessness and corruption.

We live in a democratic country wherein we have a direct say of who we want our top leaders to be. We are the ones who have the power to choose the kind of life we want for our country. Our leaders may have a direct influence over the course of our national well-being, but we as a collective citizens of this country have a voice strong enough to let our leaders know what we want them to do for us. Our responsibility for the Motherland does not end only at the precincts or in the streets or in the broad media. We also have to do our part in ensuring that the government we choose to run the country have the means to finance whatever project it deems vital toward our quest for national development. We ought to support the government in the same manner that we have to be vigilant in safeguarding our interest as a nation from them greedy and self-serving officials and business people. Let us do our own parts. We are the ones carving our own destiny.

As I ponder further on PNoy's plea for us to join him in his campaign for a better Philippines by doing away with “utak wang-wang” and individualism and other forms of social malady, my reverie goes back to Plato and his parable of the four cavemen. Then my heart silently prayed to the Almighty for Him to help us completely renew our mindsets as strive hard to inch our way toward that glimmer of light emanating outside of this cave that we are in..



________________

* It is a common belief among scholars of public administration and governance that there is no such a thing as an ideal policy. An ideal policy is said to be perfect and advantageous to all. However, policies were made because of the existence of conflicting interests among people. One policy may be of advantage to one party while being disadvantageous to the other, and vice versa. What exists, according to the scholars, is an optimum policy – a policy that may be disadvantageous to some but advantageous to the greater majority.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

MAID TO SERVE

A few hours ago, my brother Orville made an inquiry through his Facebook account on whether or not the world would be a better place if half of the important posts in government and the corporate world were to be run by women while half of the households were to be run by men. (Click here to view the thread.) I did not answer his query; rather I gave him another hypothetical scenario by pointing out that Filipina maids are all over the world running the households of commoners and the rich, the powerful and the famous. What would happen if ever ALL the Filipina maids all over the world decided and actually carried out a simultaneous one- or two-day strike?

I did not mean that query as a pun to the Filipina maids. I am in no position to do so because I am only but a very humble person with no university diploma or even a centavo of bank savings. In fact, I am one of the many supporters and sympathizers to the plight of and tolls being extracted on the millions of Philippine citizens who are forced to leave the country in search for greener pastures.

Anyway, I think that somewhere along the course of the discussion, I have committed something wrong. Hence the Almighty taught me a lesson by causing a Filipino friend of mine to ask me to do her laundry! I am not her maid, for crying out out, yet the way she asked me to do that household chore for her was quite demeaning to me. "So what do you intend to do today? Ah, you can do my laundry though. It would be a great honor for me [for you to wash my clothes]." I was very surprised to receive from her such a command sugar-coated as a request. It was at around 5am just today; I was about to go to sleep while she just woke up and was preparing to leave for work. Obviously, those statements were not to be mistaken for a joke for that was no time for one!

In my horrified state, I simply told her that I am not her maid but I can definitely try to help her in re-stacking her laundromat-cleaned laundry. Then the cruel joke of the situation hit me: I have used the maids as a base for a hypothetical scenario; now it seems that I am being taken or viewed by my own friend as her personal assistant slash maid-in-waiting.

Ahh, karma really strikes fast.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Looking Back With Jubilation, Sharing With Grateful Hearts

Speech penned for Judge Ester Piscoso-Flor which she delivered during the 2010 NVGCHS Grand Alumni Homecoming in Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya


The honorable Guest Speaker, my esteemed co-alumni of our beloved alma mater, visitors, ladies and gentlemen, a pleasant morning to all of you.

For quite some time now, it has been the tradition of the NVGHS Alumni Association to gather us every five years for a grand alumni homecoming in celebration of the good life that has been bestowed upon us by the Almighty. We have gone through a lot. We have had our own shares of joy and pain, of jubilation and frustration, of convenience and hardship, of the coming of a new life and the passing of another one. Even before we've left the portals of our beloved alma mater, we have started to witness the various facets of life and have endured many trials that have dealt us some almost fatal blows. But lo and behold, here we are gathered in this place – so much alive and still kicking hard.

“Life is NOT a bed of roses,” or so people say. Do you believe in that cliché? A few years ago, I firmly believed in it. I viewed life as a nasty game wherein only the fit and strong will survive. But after reflecting on everything that transpired in my life, I came up to the conclusion that life is beautiful and is very much comparable to a bed of roses. The crimson color of the petals is very much pleasing to the eyes, especially against the backdrop of the lush greens. However, the rose bushes are filled with thorns too. It is therefore up to us whether to appreciate the beautiful contrast of colors or to make a fuss over the intermingling of those painfully biting thorns. In essence, the beauty or ugliness of life is dependent upon our own dispositions in and perceptions of life as a whole.*

That reverie can also be analogous to us as collective members of our alumni association. We belong to the same organization, to one body... at ang sakit ng kalingkingan ay sakit ng buong katawan. We are gathered here as one. We are acting as one toward the attainment of our organization's goals and objectives. We have gone through a lot, but we rather magnify the true, the good and the beautiful. Nevertheless, we have also learned our lessons from past mistakes. And we shall not stop striving for excellence until the not-so-bad becomes good, the good becomes better and the better becomes best. We shall continue to strive and make our association become meaningful and vital to to the life of every member. Because we are one. We sink, we swim; we rise, we fall; we dream, we face our fate together.**

All of us have dreams. We all dream for greater successes. We all dream for the good life. But we are aware that in this dog-eat-dog world, the courageous and well-prepared visionaries dominate the chance of making it to the summit. However, victory and success are not exclusively for people who dream big and spend big-time. Victory and Success open their doors, too, to people like you and me, people who endeavor to leave a lasting mark – a legacy – on even the most minute aspect of our respective lives. Victory and success are sweet, but nothing is sweeter than to witness the human soul triumph over the many adversities of life.***

That is why we are gathered here now – to celebrate the big and small triumphs in the lives of the graduates of our beloved alma mater.

Let us then start the celebration for the sweet life we have had for the past years so with that of 2011 and beyond. Indeed, life is very sweet and so much worth celebrating.

Thank you.

____________________________

* Culled from my essay "On My Window"
** Quoted from Morgan Freeman's 1989 movie "Lean on Me"
*** Culled from my essay "Second Quarter Storm"